INSECT DYES
English |
Azeri Turk |
Turkish |
German |
French |
Italian |
Spanish |
Russian |
Persian |
Scientific Name |
Cochineal, Kermes |
qırmız böceyi |
kırmız böceği |
cochenille |
cochenille |
cocciniglia |
cochinilla |
кошениль |
قرمز دانه ، قرمز شراب كش |
Dactylopius coccus or Coccus Cacti, Porphyrophora hameli type (Caucasia), Porphyrophora polonica |
We can summarize all
the insect dyes which have been used for rugs into three main groups. These
insects are biologically different from each other:
1. Cochineal dye which is isolated from:
a) Porphyrophora hameli - This local type of cochineal has been used in Azerbaijan from ancient times up to the 20th century.
b) Margarodes polonicus and Porphyrophora polonica. - This is called Polish Cochineal. Of the various insect dyes known to readers of oriental decorative art literature, the Polish Cochineal coccid dye insect and its dye are least familiar. However, this coccid dye producer was for many centuries a dominant factor in the textile dye trade and commercial history-of eastern Europe and the Near East. While there is little specific evidence that Polish Cochineal dye was used in any category of Oriental rug, its presence in the market at the time certain rug types were made would be a complicating factor in drawing conclusions about insect dye use.
c) Dactylopius coccus or Coccus Cacti- The cochineal dye which is originated in Spanish America or in other Spanish territories, from a cactus-feeding insect, and was used in certain rugs and textiles of the Caucasus, Persia, and Turkey.
2. Kermes - Kermes (originally kırmız, qırmız ), originates from the word "kirmizi", which means "red" in all Turkic languages. Kermes dye extracted from the dried bodies of the females of a scale insect in the genus Kermes, primarily Kermes ilicis (formerly Coccus ilicis) or Kermes vermilio, distantly related to the cochineal insect, and found on species of oak (esp. Kermes oak) in Mediterranean countries, also in certain parts of Iran.
3.
Lac dye
-The lac dye originated in Northern India, from an insect (Kerria
Lacca), producing both dye and shellac, and was used in rugs and textiles in
India and in areas along trade routes where lac was available.
|
Dyestuff |
Insect Sources |
Area |
Comments |
1.1) Cochineal of Azerbaijan (Qurd qırmızısı, Gırmız, Kirmiz) |
Porphyrophora hamelii - in Margarodidae Family |
Azerbaijan, perhaps Central Asia on roots of Aeluropus grass, eastern Anatolia, salt marshes of Nakhchyvan (Nakhichevan), also territory of today's Republic of Armenia |
Used up to early 20th century |
Polish Cochineal (Margarodes polonicus, Porphyrophora polonica) in Margarodidae Family |
Sandy soils of eastern Europe and perhaps Asia; on roots of low plants, Scleranthus perennis |
Difficult to harvest but widely used, into 19th century |
|
Spanish Cactus Cochineal; Dactylopius coccus in Dactylopiidae (= Coccidae) Family: |
Parasite feeding on nopal and opuntia cactus; varying parts of Spanish America, Canary Islands and Malaga, Spain |
Supplanted old world dyes at different times in rug-making areas |
|
Oak kermes (Kermococcus vermilis) in Kermidae Family |
Branches of oak shrub {Quercus coccifera) in Mediterranean coastal regions - Western and Southern Turkey, Greece, S.Italia, Holy Lands, N.Africa, also some parts of Iran and N. Iraq |
Partly replaced by American cochineal in the 17th- 18th century |
|
Kerria lacca |
India, South East Asia |
|
Table A. Descriptive Characteristics of Insect Dyes for Oriental Rugs and Textiles
1.1. COCHINEAL OF AZERBAIJAN - KIRMIZ / GIRMIZ (PORPHYROPHORA HAMELI)
|
|
||||||||||||||
a) Historical References The earliest historical reference to this dye or color is dated to 714 B.C., when Sargon II of Assyria attacked the kingdom of Urartu* and acquired as part of the booty "scarlet textiles of Ararat and Kurkhi."
A number of references in the
Middle Ages to a red of Azerbaijan document a region-specific dyestuff,
particularly in the writings of Muslim geographers of the 9th through 14th
centuries. Ahmad Ibn Yahya al-Baladuri
(Balazuri) (d. ca. 892) described Ardizat, to the east of Agridag (Ararat),
as Karya-al-Kirmiz, the "town of kirmiz."
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
b) Cochineal of Azerbaijan -
Gırmız (Porphyrophora hamelii): Entomology, Geography, and Biochemistry All categories of
the Coccoidea have quite specific host- parasite relationships. whereby the
coccid insect owes its survival and geographic distribution to specific plants.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||
c) The life cycle and related biological aspects of the Cochineal of Azerbaijan - Gırmız As with all these dye insects, it is the female which produces the colorant. The insects are collected for dye harvesting during the non- terrestrial mating phase in the early fall. Insect density on the ground and the host grass during this period can be very high. An English translation of the writing of German geographer Friedrich Parrott, ca. 1829, describes "...a number of cochineal insects, some of which were creeping about on the dry sand and short grass, but the greater part were collected...in large nests, round the roots of a short, hard species of grass - the dactylis littoralis...." Parrott was in Caucasia when he made these observations. In September and October, the cochineal of Azerbaijan emerges from the soil very early in the morning and mates. Fertilized females reenter the soil and lay eggs. In the following April and early May, larvae emerge from the eggs and leave the soil briefly to feed on the new grass. They return to the soil and attach themselves to the roots of the host grass for the balance of the feeding cycle. The dye-bearing female cochineal adult insects are gathered at the time of mating in the autumn. d) Chemistry & Biochemistry of Gırmız Dyestuff Methods for the isolation and purification of the dye from the cochienal coccid have still not been fully duplicated from the centuries-old fragments of archival data. We do know a fair amount about the insect's biochemistry, however. In terms of economics and trade, we know that there was a single annual harvest of the adult female in the autumn and that the dye amounts to up to 5% of the insect's live weight. Also, isolation of the dye is complicated by interferences from a rather high fat content, up to about 30% by weight. The range of colors in the dye extraction media was a simple function of the chemical conditions of the dye harvesting process, while the appearance of the dried cochineal insects themselves could range considerably. In Babenko's article, reprinted here, the director of the laboratory investigating the cochineal of Azerbaijan -girmiz noted that the dried insects were not red but were a variety of other colors. This remark is of marginal relevance to the technology of the dye. Any dye/chemical technologist would confirm that the biochemical form of a dye or pigment in the insect as well as the visual appearance of the insect itself need not accord to the eye with the chemically isolated, pure dyestuff. Linguistically, the various oriental languages which use the root term for worm in various words for red could also intend for this term to connote "red (of the) worm." What is the chief chemical principle of the dyestuff in the cochineal of Azerbaijan? The answer to this question was not to be found in the open scientific literature, although the related research results of Dr. H. Jonathon Banks for the closely related Polish Cochineal dye product showed that carminic acid was virtually the entire active color principle. Only traces of other colored substances were found. Identification of carminic acid as the color principle in the cochineal of Azerbaijan, the same as that in the American (Spanish) cactus cochineal and the related Polish Cochineal, may help explain why the Azerbaijan species ceased being a dominant trade material in western Asia. This is discussed further in the report. e) Use of cochineal in Decorative Arts of Azerbaijan We would expect that Caucasian rugs of Azerbaijan made as recently as the 18th century and perhaps later would have used cochineal red from Porphyrophora hamelii. When one carefully reads the comments of F. R. Martin and later writers concerning the vivid scarlet red in that group of rugs called the Dragon carpets, especially the earlier examples produced in the 17th and early 18th centuries in Azerbaijan, there is reason to expect that cochineal of Azerbaijan red was used in the earliest carpets of this group and some of their stylistic ancestors. There is little hard evidence to indicate that use of the cochineal of Azerbaijan as dyestuff in local rug production ended with any phase-out of this red dye as an exportable trade item. There is a general paucity of evidence at the remote village or town level to show either ending or continuation of Cochineal of Azerbaijan - gırmız use. However, in the September, 1987, issue of the Wright Research Report, Wright furnishes information indicating continued use of the cochineal into the early 20th century. In 1925, A. S. Piralov, author of a 1913 study on rugs, wrote a report on rugmaking in Trans-Caucasus. In the report, he cites observations and statistics of M.G. Reliev to show: "...cochineal is found in the barren steppes of Ganja province (of Azerbaijan) and in the swamps and salt marshes of the Autonomous Republic of Nakhichevan (part of Azerbaijan) in the Araz valley, where the rural population in peacetime (pre-World War I) collected up to 500 puds (9 tons) a year." In the Wright report, either Piralov or Reliev does confuse what is obviously the cochineal of Azerbaijan with the American (Spanish) cactus coccid, since it is noted that "...Coccus cacti (kyrmyz to the natives) is far superior to madder...cochineal is an extremely precious dye and beyond compare." Note also how the persistence of the term "kyrmyz, qyrmyz" in the native area of the cochineal of Azerbaijan would induce and sustain confusion between the local coccid and the oak kermes coccid insects. |
1.2) THE POLISH COCHINEAL INSECT AND ITS DYE
Ancient Slavs
developed a method of obtaining red dye from the larvae of the Polish
cochineal.
|
1.3) AMERICAN (SPANISH) COCHINEAL - DACTYLOPIUS COCCUS
D. coccus is native to tropical and subtropical South America and Mexico. This
type of insect, a primarily sessile parasite, lives on cacti from the genus
Opuntia, feeding on moisture and nutrients in the cacti. Scientifically, the
cochineal dyestuff from this New World coccid is carminic acid, the same
chemical species found in both the Polish (Porphyrophora polonica) and Kirmiz
coccids (Porphyrophora hamelii). Carminic acid can be extracted from the
insect's body and eggs to make the dye. |
|
||
History The cochineal dye was used by the Aztec and Maya peoples of Central and North America. Eleven cities conquered by Montezuma in the 15th century paid a yearly tribute of 2000 decorated cotton blankets and 40 bags of cochineal dye each. During the colonial period the production of cochineal (grana fina) grew rapidly. Produced almost exclusively in Oaxaca, Mexico by indigenous producers, cochineal became Mexico's second most valued export after silver. Not long after Cortez's arrival in the New World in 1518, cactus cochineal dye started to be shipped back to Spain. Also during this time, the introduction of sheep to Latin America increased the use of cochineal, as it provided the most intense colour and it set more firmly on woolen garments than on clothes made of materials of pre-Hispanic origin such as cotton, agave fibers and yucca fibers. In the second half of the 16th century, there is abundant evidence that New World cochineal dye was being shipped to Spain and elsewhere. This dye reached Europe through Spanish ports such as Cadiz and Seville. By 1560, available dye exceeded Spain's domestic needs and dye was exported to the rest of Europe, beginning with the Low Countries and with Antwerp as market center. England was importing the American (Spanish) dye by 1558. The dyestuff was consumed throughout Europe and was so highly prized that its price was regularly quoted on the London and Amsterdam Commodity Exchanges. American (Spanish) cochineal dye reached Asia by the 1550s by way of at least four trade routes, which are germane to the dye's potential for use in oriental textiles of high value: 1) from the Levant to Persia, and then to India; 2) from Constantinople and Black Sea ports to Turkey and the Caspian region; 3) directly to India in ships from England; and 4) direct transport from New Spain to Asia via the Philippines. Persia was a recognized market for the Spanish dye from the beginning of the 17th century, based on entries in State Papers for 1617-1621. The workshops of Isfahan are recorded in States Papers of 1625-1629 as having received Spanish dye through Venice and on occasion through Constantinople. Donkin, R.A. refers to State Papers of the period to show that dye traders in Persia resold the cochineal substance in cities of northern India in the early 1600s. After the Mexican War of Independence in 1810–1821, the Mexican monopoly on cochineal came to an end. Large scale production of cochineal emerged especially in Guatemala and the Canary Islands. The demand for cochineal fell sharply with the appearance on the market of alizarin crimson and many other artificial dyes discovered in Europe in the middle of the 19th century, causing a significant financial shock in Spain as a major industry almost ceased to exist. The delicate manual labor required for the breeding of the insect could not compete with the modern methods of the new industry and even less so with the lowering of production costs. The "tuna blood" dye (from the Mexican name for the Opuntia fruit) stopped being used and trade in cochineal almost totally disappeared in the course of the 20th century. The breeding of the cochineal insect has been done mainly for the purposes of maintaining the tradition rather than to satisfy any sort of demand. In recent years it has become commercially valuable again, though most consumers are unaware that the 'artificial colouring' refers to a dye that is derived from an insect, at least for the red that is used within the product. One reason for its popularity is that, unlike many commercial synthetic red dyes, it is not toxic or carcinogenic. |
|||
Biology Cochineal insects are soft-bodied, flat, oval-shaped scale insects. The females, wingless and about 5 mm (0.2 in) long, cluster on cactus pads. They penetrate the cactus with their beak-like mouthparts and feed on its juices, remaining immobile. After mating, the fertilized female increases in size and gives birth to tiny nymphs. The nymphs secrete a waxy white substance over their bodies for protection from water and excessive sun. This substance makes the cochineal insect appear white or grey from the outside, though the body of the insect and its nymphs produces the red pigment, which makes the insides of the insect look dark purple. Adult males can be distinguished from females by their diminutive size and their wings. It is in the nymph stage (also called the crawler stage) that the cochineal disperses. The juveniles move to a feeding spot and produce long wax filaments. Later they move to the edge of the cactus pad where the wind catches the wax filaments and carries the cochineals to a new host. These individuals establish feeding sites on the new host and produce a new generation of cochineals. Male nymphs feed on the cactus until they reach sexual maturity; when they mature they cannot feed at all and live only long enough to fertilize the eggs. They are therefore seldom observed. |
|||
Host Plant Dactylopius coccus is native to tropical and subtropical South America and Mexico, where their host cacti grow natively. They have been introduced to Spain, the Canary Islands, Algiers and Australia along with their host cacti. There are 150 species of Opuntia cacti, and while it is possible to cultivate cochineal on almost all of them, the best to use is Opuntia ficus-indica.[9] All of the host plants of cochineal colonies were identified as species of Opuntia including Opuntia amyclaea, O. atropes, O. cantabrigiensis, O. brasilienis, O. ficus-indica, O. fuliginosa, O. jaliscana, O. leucotricha, O. lindheimeri, O. microdasys, O. megacantha, O. pilifera, O. robusta, O. sarca, O. schikendantzii, O. stricta, O. streptacantha, and O. tomentosa. Feeding cochineals can damage the cacti, sometimes killing their host. Cochineals other than D. coccus will feed on many of the same Opuntia species, and it is likely that the wide range of hosts reported for the former species is because of the difficulty in distinguishing it from these other, less common species.
|
|||
Cochineals are farmed in the traditional method
by planting infected cactus pads or infecting existing cacti with cochineals and
harvesting the insects by hand. The controlled method uses small baskets called
Zapotec nests placed on host cacti. The baskets contain clean, fertile females
which leave the nests and settle on the cactus to await insemination by the
males. In both cases the cochineals have to be protected from predators, cold
and rain. The complete cycle lasts 3 months during which the cacti are kept at a
constant temperature of 27 °C. Once the cochineals have finished the cycle, the
new cochineals are ready to begin the cycle again or to be dried for dye
production.
|
|||
Dye A deep crimson dye is extracted from the female cochineal insects. Cochineal is used to produce scarlet, orange and other red tints too. The colouring comes from carminic acid, as in other insect dyes. Cochineal extract's natural carminic-acid content is usually 19–22%. The insects are killed by immersion in hot water (after which they are dried) or by exposure to sunlight, steam, or the heat of an oven. Each method produces a different colour which results in the varied appearance of commercial cochineal. The insects must be dried to about 30 percent of their original body weight before they can be stored without decaying. It takes from 155 000 to 250 000 insects to make one kilogram of cochineal. There are two principal forms of cochineal dye: cochineal extract is a colouring made from the raw dried and pulverised bodies of insects (it is used to dye woolen and silk yarns), and carmine is a more purified colouring made from the cochineal. To prepare carmine, the powdered insect bodies are boiled in ammonia or a sodium carbonate solution, the insoluble matter is removed by filtering, and alum is added to the clear salt solution of carminic acid to precipitate the red aluminium salt. Purity of colour is ensured by the absence of iron. For shades of purple, lime is added to the alum.
|
|||
|
2) THE OAK KERMES INSECT (KERMOCOCCUS VERMILIS PLANCHON) - KIRMIZ BÖCEĞI (TURKISH)
Distribution of the Kermococcus vermilis is, of course, that of the host oak
species. This oak is found predominantly along the shores of Mediterranean
Europe, North Africa, and the Near East, with distribution extending along a
fringe into Iraq and southwest Persia (see map above).
|
In India the most common host trees are: Dhak (Butea
monosperma), Ber (Ziziphus mauritiana), Kusum (Schleichera oleosa) In China the common host trees include: Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan), Hibiscus species
Lac dye in History Lac dye has been used in Persia since at least 714 B.C. According to Dr. Paul Mushak, an expert in chemical analysis of rug dyes, lac dye “…was the principal red dye used in classical Persian (Iranian) carpets...” Lac was primarily used to dye silk, yielding a range of colors from rose to purple. Lac dye is still produced in the same way as it was in medieval times. S |
NOTES
Mączak, Antoni (June 2005). "Gdy czewiec polski barwił Europę"
Bodenheimer, F.S., Animal and Man in Bible Lands, Leiden, 1960.
Mushak, P., "A Chemical Analysis of the Princeton Mamluk," Oriental Rug Review, Vol. V, No.6, pp. 4-5,1987.
Tryščuk, Petr (2006-08-09). Polská košenila – karmínové barvivo. Slované.
(Latin) Breyne (Breynius),
Johann Philipp (1731). Historia naturalis Cocci Radicum Tinctorii quod polonicum
vulgo audit.
(Polish) Jakubski, Antoni Władysław (1934). Czerwiec polski (Porphyrophora
polonica (L.). Studium historyczne ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem roli czerwca w
historii kultury. Warsaw: Wyd. Kasy im. Mianowskiego – Instytutu Popierania
Nauki, 502.
Whiting, M.C., "Dye Analysis in Carpet Studies," Hali, Vol. 1, No.1, pp. 39-42, 1978.
Whiting, M.C., "The Dyes in Turkmen Carpets," Turkmen: Tribal Carpets and Traditions, L. W. Mackie and J . Thompson, eds., The Textile Museum, Washington, D.C., 1980, pp. 217-224.
Bruggemann, W. and Bohmer, H., Rugs of the Peasants and Nomads of Anatolia, Kunst and Antiquitaten, Munich, 356pp.
Donkin, R.A., "Spanish Red. An Ethnogeographical Study of Cochineal and the Opuntia Cactus," Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, Vol. 67, Part 5, pp. 1-84, 1977.
Baranyovits, F.L.C., "Cochineal Carmine: An Ancient Dye with a Modern Role," Endeavor: New Series, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 85-92, 1978.
Reviews of various aspects of insect dyes are contained in: Donkin, R.A., "The Insect Dyes of Western and West- Central Asia," Anthropos: International Review of Ethnology and Linguistics 72: 847-880, 1977; Banks, M.J., Pigments of the Coccoidea - Current knowledge and chemotaxonomic implications. Proceedings of the Symposium: Recent Advances in the Study of Scale Insects, Research Division Bulletin 127, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, pp. 51-67.
Brunello, F., The Art of Dyeing in the History of Mankind, Neri Pozza, ed., Vicenza, Italy, 1973, 467 pp., English edition, Phoenix Dye Works, Cleveland, Ohio.
Dr. Wolfe (1764). "An Account of the Polish Cochineal".
Early Soviet Period
Transcaucasian Rug Industry, The R. E. Wright Research Report, Vol. 5,
No.5, September, 1987, M.&W. Publications, Falls Church, Virginia.
Jeremy Baskes, Indians, Merchants and Markets: A Reinterpretation of the Repartimiento and Spanish-Indian Economic Relations in Colonial Oaxaca, 1750–1821, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000.
Amy Butler Greenfield, A Perfect Red: Empire, Espionage, and the Quest for the Color of Desire, New York: Harper Collins Press, 2005.
Brian Hamnett, Politics and Trade in Southern Mexico, 1750–1821, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971.
David McCreary, Rural Guatemala 1760–1940, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1996.
R.A. Donkin, "Spanish Red: An Ethnogeographical Study of Cochineal and the Opuntia Cactus," Transactions of the American Philosophical Society v. 67, pt. 5.