"Lotto" Arabesque rug with kufesque border, Anatolia, early 16th century.
published MILESTONES IN THE HISTORY OF CARPETS by JON THOMPSON. Moshe
Tabibnia Collection, Milan 2006
109x180cm (3'7"x5'11").
From the James Lucas Collection, the following
sold on 14 December 2001 (lot 48) for $159,750 (Est 30,000—40,000 USD), now with Moshe Tabibnia.
Information: rugtracker.com
An Oushak "Lotto" rug, West Anatolia, early 16th
century, remnants of original kilim ends, oxidized browns, rewoven side
guard stripes, sides fraying, small reweaves, scattered repiling,
approximately 5 ft. 11 in. by 3 ft. 7 in. (1.80 by 1.09 m.) Warp: wool,
Z2S, natural ivory Weft: wool, Z-spun, 2 shoots, red; 1 inch blue at
upper end Pile: wool, symmetrical knot Density: 9-10 horizontal,
12-13 vertical Sides: not original Ends: remnants of blue kilim
Colors: madder red, deep blue, light blue, blue-green, yellow, ivory,
walnut
Provenance:
1)Ed Zakian, New York 2)James
A. Lucas
3)Tabibnia
Sotheby's notes: Lorenzo Lotto, in his 1542 painting of St. Anthony for
the church of S. Giovanni e Paolo in Venice, depicted a rug almost
identical to that offered here. See Coletti, Luigi, Lotto, Bergamo, 1953,
fig. 189 for an illustration of the entire picture, or Mills, John,
"'Lotto' Carpets in Western Paintings," Hali, vol.3, no. 4, fig. 11 for a
detail showing the 'Lotto' rug. For years referred to as 'arabesque' rugs,
then 'Holbein' rugs with which they differed in field pattern but shared
border designs, in the 1950s they became known as "Lotto" rugs. This was
due to their appearance in a number of western artists' works and in
particular Lotto, with probably the best known being the Family Group,
painted in 1547 and now in The National Gallery, London, see Mills, John,
op.cit., pl. 12, p. 280. The earliest Western depiction of a "Lotto" rug
is in the 1516 work of Sebastiano del Piombo, Cardinal Bandinello Sauli,
now in the National Gallery of Art, Washington, D. C., for a detail, see
Mills, ibid, fig. 1. In order for these Eastern rugs to be included in
Western paintings, their production in Turkey most likely began in the
15th century. For a thorough discussion of the history of early Turkish
carpets see Franses, Michael and Pinner, Robert, "Turkish Carpets in the
Victoria and Albert Museum: The 'Classical' Carpets of the 15th to 17th
Centuries," Hali, v. 6, no. 4, pp. 357-381.
The "Lotto" group of
carpets have field designs of three varying types, classified by Charles
Grant Ellis as 'Anatolian', 'Ornamented' and 'Kilim,' see Ellis, C. G.,
"The 'Lotto' Pattern as a Fashion in Carpets," Festschrift fur Peter
Wilhelm Meister, Hamburg, 1975. The present rug has an 'Anatolian' field
pattern that is enclosed by a Kufesque border. Here, the Kufesque border
is open to the outside of the rug, as found in the earliest depiction of a
"Lotto" rug, the Sebastiano del Piombo work cited, as well as in the Lotto
painting of St. Anthony previously mentioned. "Lotto" rugs with the
Kufesque border are generally accepted by scholars as being the earliest
of the group as they appear in the earliest paintings. There are around 14
"Lotto" rugs extant that feature an 'Anatolian' field and open Kufesque
border as in the lot offered here, with examples in the Metropolitan
Museum of Art, the Philadelphia Museum of Art , and the Victoria and
Albert Museum, London. Please see a listing of published examples below
and Eskenazi, John, Il tappeto orientale dal XV al XVIII secolo, London,
1981, p. 54, footnote 12 for a listing of similar rugs and fragments known
to date.
While all of the rugs cited and the present rug share
field and major border designs, there are differences in the flanking
guard borders and color of the major border. Here, a light blue inner
border with a red and yellow ribbon, and a wider red outer border
enclosing an unusually spacious meander vine punctuated by flowerheads
flank the blue-green open Kufesque border. This appears to be the only rug
example with this combination of borders and it is precisely this
configuration of borders that are depicted in Lotto's painting of St.
Anthony.
For related examples please refer to: Dimand, M.S. and
Mailey, J., Oriental Rugs in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York,
1973, fig. 158, p. 184, cat. no. 68. Bensoussan, Pamela, "Five 'Lotto'
Rugs in the Musee des Arts Decoratifs, Paris," Hali, vol. 3, no. 4, fig.
1, p. 276. Ellis, Charles Grant, Oriental Carpets in the Philadelphia
Museum of Art, Philadelphia, 1988, pls. 6, 7 (inward oriented Kufesque
border), 8, pp. 22-29. Dimand, Maurice S., The Ballard Collection of
Oriental Rugs in the City Art Museum of St. Louis, St. Louis, 1935, pl.
XXI. Lanier, Mildred B., English and Oriental Carpets at Williamsburg,
Colonial Williamsburg, Virginia, 1975, pl. 23, pp. 70-71. Mills, John,
"'Lotto' Carpets in Western Paintings," Hali, vol. 3, no. 4, p. 282 from
the Wher Collection, Switzerland. Eskenazi, John, Il tappeto orientale
dal XV al XVIII secolo, London, 1981, pl. 7 and Alexander, Christopher, A
Foreshadowing of 21st Century Art, Berkeley, 1993, pp. 228-229.
Franses, Michael and Pinner, Robert, "Turkish Carpets in the Victoria and
Albert Museum: The 'Classical' Carpets of the 15th to 17th Centuries,"
Hali, vol. 6, no. 4, fig. 6, p. 364. Boralevi, Alberto, Oriental
Geometries: Stefano Bardini and the Antique Carpet, Florence, 1999, pp.
54-55.
image source:
http://marcusonandhall.com/articles/as-good-as-it-gets
|